¸„ø¤º°¨“ Serious Question“º¤ø„¸
…it’s true we all tend to surround ourselves with people like us. It’s an evolution thing. Do you think NASCAR would exist if the first asshole who suggested a “sport” of driving in a big circle for 5 hours had friends owning non-vrooom-related interests? This is why we should all try to be aware that the outside-of-my-group community is different from in.
I claim no immunity; I get loads of positive feedback about my awesome fontro-mancy, so I continue to think it’s a good idea and never notice it might be an affectation. What I’m eventually trying to convey is that Freethoughtblahgs is a xenophobic echo chamber slightly less “spin-free” than Fox News. and I have proof. I made a spoken-word video of my Sexism post here and contrasted it’s reception on YouTube with the response of FU Taylor, who is most representative of FTBlahgs.
There you have it. Prima facie, non-sequitir, e pluribus unum. By showing that people who flock to my interweb outlet like me better than those who accumulate at FU’s domain, I’ve proven that FTBlahgs is way off-base and that my fans alone are representative of the rationalist community. Ispo, fatso:
1. FTB spends far too much time on sexism as compared to other important issues. For example, I posted this because free speech:
2. Anyone who offers principled disagreement on a matter of sexism are attacked with vitriol, branding, and strawmen, no matter how clever their text mark-up or how charming their accent. This is more like being big mean pricks than being “freethoughtblahgs”.